How can Jesuit institutions effectively respond to the profound ideological division that threatens U.S. society today? What does it mean to embrace a Jesuit, Catholic mission in such a way that it can help our campus communities and our nation to navigate the turbulence through which we are living?

As the only institution of higher education in the world that can boast having both the Jesuits and the Religious Sisters of Mercy as its founders, how has their strong union and integrated mission to build servant-leaders unfolded and evolved over time?

What might a difficult conversation, anchored in humility, look like in everyday life on our Jesuit campuses?

Where should we draw the line between giving students a sense of the historical development of the world in which they live and presenting them with works that more closely reflect their own lived experience?

How can Jesuit colleges and universities create a space for both career preparation and the pursuit of deeper questions of meaning and vocation for students?

How can a liberal education embrace both an interrogatory engagement with “Great Books” and a more expansive vision of who qualifies as a “great?”

While content and coherence are key to the architecture of a core curriculum, how can dialogue about content generate fruitful innovation?

Despite the neoliberal and technocratic forces impeding the fragile educational project of higher education, how might programs in faculty engagement rooted in the Catholic, Jesuit intellectual tradition serve as a place of both personal and intellectual renewal?

Although Christopher Kaczor offers useful categories for understanding the complex challenge of mission drift, how might the hiring of people committed to the Catholic tradition and the inviting of those already among us to make the mission their own make a deeper impact?

While Christopher Kaczor’s observations and warnings on mission drift make eminently good sense, how do mission integration stakeholders communicate their rationale with colleagues who may be less than sanguine about Catholic and Jesuit mission?